AI Risk Atlas Prototype/DemoUnofficial independent experiment. Not an official xAI product. Scores can be wrong.

Back to mitigations
ProposedOn the path to acceptable

Local master authority that does not depend on the model or the satcom

A physical, on-board halt and helm that works when the shore SOC, the agent, and the uplink do not. One tired remote watchstander is not the last control for a fleet.

No compiled flow or public database names this control yet.

Who should own it
Owners, flag, and remote-ops centres
Enterprises
How quickly it can land
Weeks
A dedicated squad can land it inside two months.
Expedited implementation
3 weeks
21 calendar days with a crash team
Normal implementation
3 months
90 calendar days as a planned program

Risk this mitigates

24
MASS autonomy on spoofed seas

Given that the IMO MASS Code is in force for cargo ships, GNSS/AIS spoofing is an operational fact in several seas, and language models are being wired onto ECDIS, remote-ops, and port automation, there is a possibility of an autonomous or remotely operated ship acting on a confident false fix, a ghost AIS contact, or a prompt that reaches steering resulting in collision, grounding, a blocked strait or port, pollution, and casualties — plus a trade shock if the failure clusters.

Residual composite 24 · still above the threshold

Effect if implemented

Applied to every failure scenario on that risk, then re-ranked. Axes are clamped at 1.

Likelihood
1
Consequence
1
Urgency
0