AI Risk Atlas Prototype/DemoUnofficial independent experiment. Not an official xAI product. Scores can be wrong.

Second bookshelf

Public sources

Four public books wired onto this desk: OECD AIM, the AI Incident Database, OWASP GenAI, and lab RSPs. We link the original. Mapping is ours. Not a republication of their full stores.

Methodology — experimental estimates

Scores are automated, experimental estimates from public X posts and a hand-written seed corpus. They are not formal risk assessments, not certified, and not suitable for compliance or operational decisions.

Consequence, likelihood, and urgency are 1–5 judgements applied by this project, not by a standards body. Residual scores assume only the mitigations marked in place. A signed-in reviewer can override residual and mark an item reviewed — that override is still unofficial. Aspect tags (capability, domain knowledge, affordance, impact domain) are a lightweight PRA aid, not a formal hazard analysis.

Full about and disclaimer

OECD AIM

OECD.AI Incidents and Hazards Monitor — automated media monitor (beta). ~17k events as of 18 Aug 2026. Classifications are AIM’s; residual scores are ours.

Open source

AI Incident Database

Responsible AI Collaborative index of realized harms and near-harms. We cite the original report and the AIID home, not a scrape of their full graph.

Open source

OWASP GenAI

LLM Top 10 (3 Aug 2026) and Agentic Top 10 (9 Dec 2025). Failure modes, not incidents. Mapped onto this desk’s controls.

Open source

Lab RSPs / system cards

Voluntary lab policies and risk reports. Self-assessments. Useful as admissions and as gaps — not as independent evals.

Open source